400-688-2626

惠誉确认中国的融创的评级为‘BB-’级;展望稳定(中英)

来源:网络 2013-08-18 16:57:42

惠誉评级—香港—2013年7月30日:惠誉评级已确认房地产开发商融创中国控股有限公司(融创)长期发行人违约评级(IDR)为‘BB-’级,展望稳定。惠誉同时还确认融创高级无担保评级为‘BB-’级。评级的确认反映了公司利 ...

惠誉评级—香港—2013年7月30日:惠誉评级已确认房地产开发商融创中国控股有限公司(融创)长期发行人违约评级(IDR)为‘BB-’级,展望稳定。惠誉同时还确认融创高级无担保评级为‘BB-’级。

评级的确认反映了公司利润的下滑和结构性次级程度的上升,以及销售的快速增长和过去强大的执行能力。

关键评级驱动因素

小众战略的强大执行能力:公司在其核心市场,即以一线城市为主的中高端市场拥有强大的品牌效应和执行力。公司稳健的执行能力和市场开拓战略使其资产得到快速周转——2012年合同销售/总债务之比为1.4倍,2013年上半年合同销售同比增长超过80%,达到203亿元人民币。惠誉预期2013年下半年公司将持续获得超额业绩。

合资公司促进增长:惠誉预期合资公司将在未来18个月内继续在融创的资本结构和土地收购中起到重要作用。融创的土地储备中,总建筑面积(GFA)的34%左右估计来自于少数股权。合资公司的使用有利于公司的业务扩张,分担了土地出让金费用,并能利用不同开发商的优势。

较高的结构性次级程度:融创采用的合资公司,特别是上海融创绿城房地产开发股份有限公司也意味着次级从属的情況将限制融创自由使用该公司的现金。为了反映这种结构性次级,惠誉在对融创的杠杆率进行计算时包括了未合并的子公司,同时将少数股份视作债务。这导致2012年修正过的净债务/调整后存货之比为43%,与报告的29%存在差异。

利润率下降:虽然过去三年间公司业务规模大幅扩张,但由于国内竞争加剧和土地成本上升,EBITDA利润率从2010年的40%下行至2012年的22%,惠誉预期利润率将在未来12个月内保持类似水平,直到公司出售新近收购的项目存货为止。

监管风险依然较高:在政府致力于降低房地产价格的背景下,专注于中高端市场的融创与其它主要提供普通住宅产品的同业相比,监管风险敞口更大。融创2012年住宅项目的平均销售价格为每平方米17,800元人民币,高于同业水平。

多元化的融资渠道:截至2012年底,融创总债务为218亿元人民币,包括境外债券和境内银行贷款。公司除了在2013年发行的5亿美元的债券以外,还通过一家合资公司——Sunac Greentown Investment Holdings Limited获得4亿美元的境外三年期贷款。融创通过这些举措分散了债务到期日并降低了融资成本。

评级敏感性:

负面:单独或共同导致惠誉采取负面的评级行动的未来发展因素包括:
 
— 融创的市场和产品组合出现不利变化,导致EBITDA利润率持续低于20%(2012年:除对收购项目再评估的影响外为25%以上)
 
— 合同销售/总债务之比持续低于1.2倍
 
— 修正后净债务/调整后存货比率持续高于50%
 
— 上海融创绿城较之公司规模过快的增长
  
正面:单独或共同导致惠誉采取正面的评级行动的未来发展因素包括:
 
— EBITDA利润率持续超过30%
 
—修正后净债务/调整后存货比率持续低于35%
 
—合同销售/总债务之比持续高于1.5倍

英文:

Fitch Ratings-Hong Kong-30 July 2013: Fitch Ratings has affirmed property developer Sunac China Holdings Limited's (Sunac) Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'BB-' with a Stable Outlook. The agency has also affirmed the company's senior unsecured rating at 'BB-'.

The affirmation reflects falling margins and rising structural subordination, balanced against rapid sales growth and a track record of strong execution.

Key Rating Drivers

Strong execution of niche strategy: The company has strong branding and execution in its core markets, i.e. mid- to high-end segments, primarily in China's higher tier cities. Its solid execution and marketing strategy result in fast asset turnover, as demonstrated by 1.4x of contracted sales/total debt in 2012, and over 80% year-on-year growth in contracted sales to CNY20.3bn in H113. Fitch expects the outperformance to continue for the rest of 2013.

JV facilitates growth: Fitch expects joint ventures (JVs) to continue playing an important role in Sunac's capital structure and land acquisitions in the next 18 months. Around 34% of total gross floor area (GFA) in Sunac's land bank is estimated to be attributable to minority interest. The use of JVs facilitates the company's business expansion, shares the burden of land premiums, and leverages off the strengths of different developers.

Higher structural subordination: The JVs, especially Shanghai Sunac Greentown Real Estate Development Ltd, also mean Sunac's access to their cash is subordinated to the obligations of these JVs. To reflect the structural subordination, Fitch includes unconsolidated subsidiaries and treats minority interests as debt in its calculation of Sunac's leverage. This results in a modified net debt/adjusted inventory of 43% at end-2012 compared with the reported 29%.

Subdued margins: Despite major improvements in its business scale over the past three years, EBITDA margin showed a downward trend to 22% in 2012 from 40% in 2010, due to rising competition and higher land costs in China. Fitch expects margins to remain similar over the next 12 months until the company sells off old inventory in newly acquired projects.

Regulatory risks remain high: Sunac's focus on mid- to high-end segments increases its exposure to regulatory risks compared with mass-market peers, given the government's aim to make housing more affordable. Sunac's CNY17,800 per square meter of average selling price for residential projects in 2012 is higher than peers'.

Diversifying funding sources: At end-2012, Sunac's total debt of CNY21.8bn comprised of offshore bonds and onshore bank loans. In addition to USD500m notes issued in 2013, the company raised USD400m in an offshore three-year term loan at a joint venture, Sunac Greentown Investment Holdings Limited, level. These developments allow Sunac to term out maturities and lower funding costs.

Rating Sensitivities

Negative: Future developments that may, individually or collectively, lead to negative rating action include:

- Adverse changes to Sunac's markets and product mix leading to an EBITDA margin below 20% on a sustained basis (2012: over 25% excluding impact of revaluation of acquisitions)

- contracted sales/total debt below 1.2x on a sustained basis

- Modified net debt /adjusted inventory above 50% on a sustained basis

- Substantial growth in Shanghai Sunac Greentown, relative to the company's size

Positive: Future developments that may, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action include:

-EBITDA margin above 30% on a sustained basis

-Modified net debt /adjusted inventory below 35% on a sustained basis

-Contracted sales/gross debt above 1.5x on a sustained basis

中国信用财富网转发分享目的是弘扬正能量
关于版权:若文章或图片涉及版权问题,敬请源作者或者版权人联系我们(电话:400-688-2626 史律师)我们将及时删除处理并请权利人谅解!

相关推荐

住房公积金信用评级的操作步骤


网络 2014-04-19 21:58:00

重建全球信用评级体系


网络 2014-04-15 10:20:53

惠誉国际简介


网络 2013-08-18 16:47:00

标普总裁介绍


网络 2013-08-12 23:54:00

穆迪高级副总裁:中国地方债不透明


新浪财经 2013-07-14 13:27:00
关于我们 —分支机构 — 免责声明 — 意见反馈 — 地方信用 — 指导单位: 中国东盟法律合作中心商事调解委员会
Copyright © 2007-2021 CREDING.COM All Rights Reserved 中国信用财富网 统一服务电话:400-688-2626
备案/许可证号 滇B2-20070038-3 本站常年法律顾问团:北京大成(昆明)律师事务所