400-688-2626

惠誉:中国放开费率限制将促进寿险创新(中英)

来源:网络 2013-08-18 16:51:00

  惠誉评级—悉尼/香港—2013年8月6日:惠誉评级表示,中国取消寿险市场普通型人身保险(非分红产品)预定利率上限可能有助于促进寿险产品的多元化发展。如果保险公司能够提供比目前占主导地位的“分红”产品更具吸 ...

  惠誉评级—悉尼/香港—2013年8月6日:惠誉评级表示,中国取消寿险市场普通型人身保险(非分红产品)预定利率上限可能有助于促进寿险产品的多元化发展。如果保险公司能够提供比目前占主导地位的“分红”产品更具吸引力的新产品,将有利于提高人口老龄化背景下人身保障、养老和医疗产品的保险渗透率。

  既然非分红产品将不再受到2.5%的承诺收益率的限制,惠誉预期保险公司将在非分红产品中引入更多风险防护特征。防护特征和更高的承诺收益率将使此保险产品对客户具有更大吸引力。

  这一举措也将缓解市场竞争。由于目前市场上大多数保单以储蓄为基本特征,保险保障范围相对有限,因此保险产品类型相似度较高。产品类型的多样化可以帮助保险公司将其产品与银行存款和其它理财产品区分开来,从而减低与银行的直接竞争。

  中国的寿险公司需要发展更专业、更高效的代理网络来销售更复杂的产品,因为目前普遍的银行保险渠道不太可能适合销售具有风险防护特征的产品。惠誉认为,大型保险公司在推广这些产品时,由于拥有相对较强的代理销售基础,比小型保险公司更具有竞争优势。

  产品创新有利于目前已在进行的产品组合转型。中国的寿险公司越来越重视利润率的提高而非市场份额的扩大。利润率更高的期缴保费产品的发展促进了有效业务价值的增长。惠誉预期该趋势将持续,特别是如果费率定价的灵活性加大,可以推出获得客户亲睐的期缴保费非分红型产品。

  但是,分红保险产品占到中国的寿险市场主要份额,因为客户一般可以通过投资业绩分享到更高的利润回报。即使非分红产品目前可以提供2.5%以上的承诺收益率,且分红产品受制于费率上限,这种偏好仍不太可能出现很大变化。

  为避免过度竞争,保监会规定评估法定保险准备金(公司必须持有的资产规模以覆盖未来保险理赔)的贴现率上限为3.5%。如果保险公司将承诺利润率设定为高于贴现率上限,有可能更容易受到准备金不足的影响,因此不太可能出现大量保险公司提供预定利率大幅上升的产品的情况。非分红产品与分红产品相比吸引力仍然较低。

英文:

Fitch Ratings-Sydney/Hong Kong-06 August 2013: The removal of the interest rate cap on some guaranteed life products is likely to increase product diversity in the Chinese life insurance market, Fitch Ratings says. If insurers can offer new products that are more attractive than the dominant "with-profit" policies, this could help to boost the penetration of risk protection, retirement and healthcare products amid an aging population.

We expect insurers to include more risk-protection elements in their non-participating products, now that they are no longer subject to a 2.5% cap on guaranteed rates. Protection features and better guaranteed rates could make the products more attractive to customers.

This could help ease market competition, which has been concentrated on very similar products, as most policies are savings-oriented with relatively low protection coverage. More variety could help insurers differentiate their products from bank deposits and other wealth-management offerings, and limit direct competition with banks.

Chinese life insurers will need to develop a more professional and productive agency network to sell the more complicated policies, as the popular bancassurance channel is unlikely to be suitable for policies with risk-protection features. We believe that large life insurers have an advantage over small companies in promoting these products, in light of their relatively strong agency base.

Product innovation should contribute to the shift in product mix already underway. Chinese life insurers are increasingly placing more emphasis on margin improvement than on market share. Efforts to boost more profitable regular-premium policies have contributed to the growth in the value of in-force business. This should continue, especially if greater flexibility with pricing can generate regular-premium non-participating products that gain traction with customers.

However, participating products dominate the Chinese life insurance market because customers can often obtain higher returns from sharing profit on the investment performance. This preference may not change significantly even though non-participating products can now offer guaranteed rates above 2.5% while with-profits policies are still subject to the cap.

To prevent excessive competition, the China Insurance Regulatory Commission introduced a 3.5% cap for the discount rate used for determining statutory insurance reserves - the amount of assets that firms must hold for future insurance claims. An insurer that sets a guaranteed rate above the discount rate cap could be more vulnerable to a reserve deficiency, so it is unlikely that many insurers will offer rates substantially higher. The guaranteed rate on non-participating policies could still be less attractive compared with with-profits products.

中国信用财富网转发分享目的是弘扬正能量
关于版权:若文章或图片涉及版权问题,敬请源作者或者版权人联系我们(电话:400-688-2626 史律师)我们将及时删除处理并请权利人谅解!

相关推荐

住房公积金信用评级的操作步骤


网络 2014-04-19 21:58:00

公积金贷款信用评级标准


网络 2014-04-19 21:57:00

Coface公司简介


网络 2013-09-10 14:39:00

惠誉下调中国评级背后:15万亿地方债堪忧


第一财经日报 2013-08-19 21:48:14

标普总裁介绍


网络 2013-08-12 23:54:00

穆迪高级副总裁:中国地方债不透明


新浪财经 2013-07-14 13:27:00
关于我们 —分支机构 — 免责声明 — 意见反馈 — 地方信用 — 指导单位: 中国东盟法律合作中心商事调解委员会
Copyright © 2007-2021 CREDING.COM All Rights Reserved 中国信用财富网 统一服务电话:400-688-2626
备案/许可证号 滇B2-20070038-3 本站常年法律顾问团:北京大成(昆明)律师事务所